Wet Fingered Leadership
In his book God's Politics, Jim Wallis offers this tip for anyone wishing to identify a member of Congress on the streets of Washington, DC:
- "They're the ones . . . who walk around town with their fingers held high in the air, having just licked them and put them up to see which way the wind is blowing."
Now - take a look at the decision process in your own company.
How often are choices made in your organization that simply maintain or enhance the status quo? Is there a chapter in your most recent growth plan that should be titled "Same Stuff - Only Bigger"? Congress is a mess, but it doesn't hold exclusive rights to the practice of wet-fingered leadership.
- Wallis is absolutely correct when he writes that substantive change - real change - occurs only when someone stops following the wind and takes steps to "change the wind."
If you're an airline - you change the wind by scrapping the hub-based model and flying direct between cities that are close to the most popular destinations.
Changing the wind for a large hospital with extreme over-crowding might mean looking for opportunities to spin off some services to satellite clinics instead of building a bigger facility in the same place.
The owner of a neighborhood retail shop can change the wind by not trying to compete for low prices (with Wal-Mart) and by offering a better selection, more knowledgeable clerks and a warm-inviting atmosphere.
Assignment:
- List a few examples of "wet-fingered" decisions that have been made in your industry or organization.
- Pick one or two and discuss how outcomes might have been different if those involved had "changed the wind" instead.
- Answer this question - When is it OK to use the wet-finger approach?
Let me know how it goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment